<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="ipv6-parameters.xsl"?>
<?oxygen RNGSchema="ipv6-parameters.rng" type="xml"?>
<registry xmlns="http://www.iana.org/assignments" id="ipv6-parameters">
  <title>Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Parameters</title>
  <updated>2012-05-10</updated>
  <registry id="ipv6-parameters-1">
    <title>Next Header Types</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc2460"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc2780"/>
    <note>These numbers are the same as those appearing in the the protocol numbers registry.
Please see: <xref type="registry" data="protocol-numbers"/></note>
  </registry>
  <registry id="ipv6-parameters-2">
    <title>Destination Options and Hop-by-Hop Options</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc2460"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc2780"/>
    <registration_rule>IESG Approval, IETF Consensus or Standards Action</registration_rule>
    <note>From <xref type="rfc" data="rfc2460"/> IPv6 Option Types are 8-bit values, structured as 
three subfields, are defined in <xref type="rfc" data="rfc2460"/> section 4.2:

   Each distinct 8-bit Option Type identifies a different option, i.e., the
   high-order 3 bits are considered part of the option identification.
   However, it is recommended that Option Types be assigned with distinct
   values in the "rest" subfield, until and unless that 5-bit space becomes
   full.</note>
    <record>
      <value>0</value>
      <act>00</act>
      <chg>0</chg>
      <rest>00000</rest>
      <description>Pad1</description>
      <xref type="text">[IPV6]</xref>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>1</value>
      <act>00</act>
      <chg>0</chg>
      <rest>00001</rest>
      <description>PadN</description>
      <xref type="text">[IPV6]</xref>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>C2</value>
      <act>11</act>
      <chg>0</chg>
      <rest>00010</rest>
      <description>Jumbo Payload</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc2675"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>C3</value>
      <rest>00011</rest>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>4</value>
      <act>00</act>
      <chg>0</chg>
      <rest>00100</rest>
      <description>Tunnel Encapsulation Limit</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc2473"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>5</value>
      <act>00</act>
      <chg>0</chg>
      <rest>00101</rest>
      <description>Router Alert</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc2711"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>26</value>
      <act>00</act>
      <chg>1</chg>
      <rest>00110</rest>
      <description>Quick-Start</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc4782"/>
      <xref type="rfc-errata" data="2034"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>7</value>
      <act>00</act>
      <chg>0</chg>
      <rest>00111</rest>
      <description>CALIPSO</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5570"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>8</value>
      <act>00</act>
      <chg>0</chg>
      <rest>01000</rest>
      <description>SMF_DPD</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-manet-smf-14"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>0xC9</value>
      <act>11</act>
      <chg>0</chg>
      <rest>01001</rest>
      <description>Home Address</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc6275"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>8A</value>
      <act>10</act>
      <chg>0</chg>
      <rest>01010</rest>
      <description>Endpoint Identification</description>
      <xref type="text">[CHARLES LYNN]</xref>
    </record>
    <record>
      <rest>01011-11101</rest>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>0x1e</value>
      <act>00</act>
      <chg>0</chg>
      <rest>11110</rest>
      <description>RFC3692-style Experiment [1]</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc4727"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>0x3e</value>
      <act>00</act>
      <chg>1</chg>
      <rest>11110</rest>
      <description>RFC3692-style Experiment [1]</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc4727"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>0x5e</value>
      <act>01</act>
      <chg>0</chg>
      <rest>11110</rest>
      <description>RFC3692-style Experiment [1]</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc4727"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>0x63</value>
      <act>01</act>
      <chg>1</chg>
      <rest>00011</rest>
      <description>RPL Option</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc6553"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>0x7e</value>
      <act>01</act>
      <chg>1</chg>
      <rest>11110</rest>
      <description>RFC3692-style Experiment [1]</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc4727"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>0x9e</value>
      <act>10</act>
      <chg>0</chg>
      <rest>11110</rest>
      <description>RFC3692-style Experiment [1]</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc4727"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>0xbe</value>
      <act>10</act>
      <chg>1</chg>
      <rest>11110</rest>
      <description>RFC3692-style Experiment [1]</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc4727"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>0xde</value>
      <act>11</act>
      <chg>0</chg>
      <rest>11110</rest>
      <description>RFC3692-style Experiment [1]</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc4727"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>0xfe</value>
      <act>11</act>
      <chg>1</chg>
      <rest>11110</rest>
      <description>RFC3692-style Experiment [1]</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc4727"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <rest>11111</rest>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <footnote anchor="1">It is only appropriate to use these values in explicitly-configured experiments;
they MUST NOT be shipped as defaults in implementations.  See <xref type="rfc" data="rfc3692"/> for details.</footnote>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="ipv6-parameters-3">
    <title>Routing Types</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc2460"/>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5871"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review or IESG Approval</registration_rule>
    <note>For Traffic Class related information, please see <xref type="rfc" data="rfc2474"/><xref type="rfc" data="rfc3168"/>,
and the following registries:
   http://www.iana.org/assignments/dscp-registry
   http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-tos-byte

For IPv6 Router Alert Option Values, please see:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-routeralert-values</note>
    <record>
      <value>0</value>
      <description>Source Route (deprecated)</description>
      <xref type="text">[IPV6]</xref>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc5095"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>1</value>
      <description>Nimrod (deprecated 06-May-2009)</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>2</value>
      <description>Type 2 Routing Header</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc6275"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>3</value>
      <description>RPL Source Route Header</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc6554"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>4-252</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>253</value>
      <description>RFC3692-style Experiment 1 [2]</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc4727"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>254</value>
      <description>RFC3692-style Experiment 2 [2]</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc4727"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>255</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
    </record>
    <footnote anchor="2">It is only appropriate to use these values in explicitly-configured
experiments; they MUST NOT be shipped as defaults in implementations.
See <xref type="rfc" data="rfc3692"/> for details.</footnote>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="rpl-option-tlv">
    <title>RPL-option-TLV</title>
    <xref type="rfc" data="rfc6553"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0-254</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>255</value>
      <description>Reserved</description>
      <xref type="rfc" data="rfc6553"/>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <registry id="taggerId-types">
    <title>TaggerId Types</title>
    <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-manet-smf-14"/>
    <registration_rule>IETF Review</registration_rule>
    <record>
      <value>0</value>
      <name>NULL</name>
      <description>No TaggerId field is present</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-manet-smf-14"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>1</value>
      <name>DEFAULT</name>
      <description>A TaggerId of non-specific context is present</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-manet-smf-14"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>2</value>
      <name>IPv4</name>
      <description>A TaggerId representing an IPv4 address is present</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-manet-smf-14"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>3</value>
      <name>IPv6</name>
      <description>A TaggerId representing an IPv6 address is present</description>
      <xref type="draft" data="RFC-ietf-manet-smf-14"/>
    </record>
    <record>
      <value>4-7</value>
      <description>Unassigned</description>
    </record>
  </registry>
  
  <people/>
</registry>

